<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Everyday Reads: Is This The Future Of Search?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.signonsign.net/2008/07/future-of-search/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.signonsign.net/2008/07/future-of-search/</link>
	<description>A User Experience Designer's Playground</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 04:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: xxc</title>
		<link>http://www.signonsign.net/2008/07/future-of-search/#comment-244</link>
		<dc:creator>xxc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 06:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.signonsign.net/?p=37#comment-244</guid>
		<description>Traditional information retrieval algorithms are deal with the relevance between user's "query" and "character" based on data content. But this is not the way WE(people) doing in daily life information behavior. We always have some social tips for information quality filtering. "Social computing" and "web 2.0" are doing this systematically.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Traditional information retrieval algorithms are deal with the relevance between user&#8217;s &#8220;query&#8221; and &#8220;character&#8221; based on data content. But this is not the way WE(people) doing in daily life information behavior. We always have some social tips for information quality filtering. &#8220;Social computing&#8221; and &#8220;web 2.0&#8243; are doing this systematically.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
